0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

º¸°Ç¼Ò °Ç°­°ü¸®È¸¿øÀÇ Áø´ÜÀû ¿¬±¸

A Diagnostic study on the Registered Beneficiaries of Health Centers

Áö¿ª»çȸ°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2002³â 13±Ç 2È£ p.292 ~ 305
KMID : 0607720020130020292
À±¼ø³ç ( Yun Soon-Nyung ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

¹ÚÁ¤È£ ( Park Jung-Ho ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
¹Ú¼º¾Ö ( Park Sung-Ae ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ °£È£Çаú
¹ÚÇö¾Ö ( Park Hyeoun-Ae ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
±èÃá¹Ì ( Kim Chun-Mi ) - ¿©ÁÖ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic assessment on the level of health status, and quality of life of the health care beneficiaries registered in health management programs of public health centers. In order to investigate the level of health status and the quality of life and to find factors affecting them, the PRECEDE model, that was developed by Green, et al. for the purpose of a comprehensive diagnostic research, was used.

Method: The subjects were 81 residents who resided K-gu, Seoul. Data were colleclted form September, 1999 to August, 2000 using a self reported questionnaire. the data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test Kruskall-Wallis test, pearson¡¯s correlation coefficient, and path analysis.

Results: 1. The quality of life and the level of health promoting lifestyle were moderate or more, but were no significantly different by sex, age, marital status, educational level, occupation, and monthly household income. 2. Self-efficacy was significantly correlated to e a perceived benefit, social support and health-promoting lifestyle, perceived benefit had a significant correlation with social support and health-promoting lifestyle, Perceived benefit had a significant correlation with social support and health promoting lifestyle. There was also a significant correlation between the level of satisfaction, and the availability of the health promotion program. 3. Social support, health promoting lifestyle, and health status were found to influence the quality of life directly, whereas self efficacy and perceived benefit affected the quality of life indirectly through social support.

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the health promotion program should include strategies to strengthen self efficacy and perceived benefit to enhance social support, and to encourage health promoting behaviors in order to improve the quality of life of the health care beneficiary
KeyWords
PRECEDE ¸ðÇü, º¸°Ç¼Ò, °Ç°­ÁõÁøÇÁ·Î±×·¥, °Ç°­ÁõÁøÇàÀ§, »îÀÇ Áú
Precede-Proceed Model, Health Center, Health promotion program, Health promotion behavior, Quality of life
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed